The 300,000-year-old fossils discovered in Morocco had modern faces and more primitive brains
Archaeologists have unearthed 300,000-year-old fossilized bones of early humans — the oldest remains of Homo sapiens
yet discovered, two new studies report. The ancient bones contain a mix
of modern and primitive features that hint at an early, and previously
unknown, phase of our species’s evolution.
On the family tree of human relatives, collectively known as hominins, our ancestors split from the Neanderthal branch more than 500,000 years ago.
Fossils that looked like modern humans started showing up in East
Africa about 200,000 years ago. But when exactly modern humans evolved
from our most recent ancestor, probably Homo heidelbergensis, is a mystery. Now, two new studies published today in the journal Nature
fill in some of those missing millennia, and suggest that hominins were
well on their way to looking like modern-day humans about 300,000 years
ago.
The fossils come from an archaeological site in Morocco,
called Jebel Irhoud. Hominin bones were first pulled out of the ground
there in the 1960s, and were dated to about 40,000 years ago. But the
archaeologists were sloppy, and experts began to suspect that date was
very wrong. So, in 2004, the site reopened and over the next seven
years, archaeologists unearthed more hominin remains, including parts of
skulls and jaw bones. They also found animal bones that had been
butchered and possibly cooked, and stone tools that had been burned at
some point — all in the same layer of dirt. That’s key: being in the
same layer means these finds were all approximately the same age.
The stone tools were a lucky find, because they gave the researchers — led by Jean-Jacques Hublin and Shannon McPherron at the Max Planck Institute in Germany — a chance to date that layer precisely. By measuring how many electrons
accumulated in the tools over millennia, the researchers dated the
layer and the hominin bones within it to about 315,000 years ago.
From the skull fragments, the researchers virtually
reconstructed the faces of the ancient humans who had once lived at the
site. Their features were small, and their faces were tucked underneath
the brain case, rather than jutting out in front. “The face is the face
of somebody you could cross in the metro,” Hublin told Michael Greshko
in National Geographic.
But the brain case was more primitive — flatter and longer instead of
high and round, like ours. That’s why Hublin and his colleagues think
the ancient denizens of Jebel Irhoud were an early evolutionary phase of
Homo sapiens — somewhere on the developmental path between Homo heidelbergensis and us.
The two authors of an analysis published alongside the study agree with this assessment. But, the findings haven’t been met with universal approval. Paleoanthropologist John Hawks at the University of Wisconsin-Madison told Greshko
that these new studies “really aren’t adding anything new except the
date.” Hawks added that he doesn’t think the findings warrant creating a
new category of “early modern humans” to describe the mix of primitive
and modern traits. But regardless of what we call these ancient
relatives of ours, these new findings give us a better idea of how we
became who we are today.
No comments:
Post a Comment